🍪 Our Cookies

This website uses cookies, pixel tags, and similar technologies (“Cookies”) for the purpose of enabling site operations and for performance, personalisation, and marketing purposes. We use our own Cookies and some from third parties. Only essential Cookies are used by default. By clicking “Accept All” you consent to the use of non-essential Cookies (i.e., functional, analytics, and marketing Cookies) and the related processing of personal data. You can manage your consent preferences by clicking Manage Preferences. You may withdraw a consent at any time by using the link “Cookie Preferences” in the footer of our website.

Our Privacy Notice is accessible here. To learn more about the use of Cookies on our website, please view our Cookie Notice.

‘Snooze/lose’ crosses the Atlantic, changing US voting mechanics

Share

News and Analysis

‘Snooze/lose’ crosses the Atlantic, changing US voting mechanics

Tom Quinn's avatar
Yiwen Lu's avatar
Dan Mika's avatar
Anna Russi's avatar
  1. Tom Quinn
  2. +Yiwen Lu
  3. + 2 more
5 min read

Don’t miss out on news you won’t find anywhere else — get The Memo US and The Memo Europe in your inbox every two weeks.

For lenders to CD&R portfolio company Shearer's Foods, the on-call finance lifestyle has taken on a whole new meaning.

That’s because a so-called snooze/lose clause was included in Shearer's credit agreement, according to 9fin sources. It’s one of a few deals with the language that cleared the market this year, alongside Vista Equity Partners portfolio companies Avalara and Duck Creek Technologies, sources said.

Different formulations exist, but the clause generally enables the borrower to act — either by considering the lender to be consenting or by ignoring them when calculating the final tally — on the voting shares of lenders that do not respond to amendments, consents, or waivers within a certain time frame, often 10 business days.

The result is a borrower-friendly curtailment of voting rights to make it easier to receive lender approval on debt actions. Although this concept has long existed in the European market (see 9fin’s educational article), sources described how different voting mechanics in the US mean it carries significantly more weight.

The language has not received broad market acceptance and has in many cases faced significant pushback from lenders, sources said. But its acceptance in a handful of deals is another indication how borrowers have taken advantage of the past year’s supply-starved M&A market.

CD&R declined to comment. Vista, Shearer’s, Avalara, and Duck Creek did not respond to requests for comment.

Read all our public content for free

We won't spam. You can unsubscribe at any time.

What are you waiting for?

Try it out
  • We're trusted by the top 10 Investment Banks