🍪 Our Cookies

This website uses cookies, pixel tags, and similar technologies (“Cookies”) for the purpose of enabling site operations and for performance, personalisation, and marketing purposes. We use our own Cookies and some from third parties. Only essential Cookies are used by default. By clicking “Accept All” you consent to the use of non-essential Cookies (i.e., functional, analytics, and marketing Cookies) and the related processing of personal data. You can manage your consent preferences by clicking Manage Preferences. You may withdraw a consent at any time by using the link “Cookie Preferences” in the footer of our website.

Our Privacy Notice is accessible here. To learn more about the use of Cookies on our website, please view our Cookie Notice.

Cloud 9fin — Jane’s LME Addiction — Are lender voting and concentration caps the new and improved DQ lists?

Share

Webinars and Podcast

Cloud 9fin — Jane’s LME Addiction — Are lender voting and concentration caps the new and improved DQ lists?

9fin team's avatar
  1. 9fin team
2 min read

In this episode of Jane’s LME Addiction, our head of LME coverage Jane Komsky brings in Davis Polk partners Brian Resnick and Hilary Dengel to discuss voting cap and lender concentration cap language in credit agreements and how they may affect creditor organization and liability management exercises. They discuss the goals of these provisions, whether these provisions are “anti-co-op”, and whether they are more effective than DQ lists for sponsors trying to decide who buys into their debt.

Find all our coverage on concentration caps, voting caps, and DQ lists at 9fin.com.

Have any feedback on the podcast? Send us a note at podcast@9fin.com — thanks for listening!

What are you waiting for?

Try it out
  • We're trusted by the top 10 Investment Banks