🍪 Our Cookies

This website uses cookies, pixel tags, and similar technologies (“Cookies”) for the purpose of enabling site operations and for performance, personalisation, and marketing purposes. We use our own Cookies and some from third parties. Only essential Cookies are used by default. By clicking “Accept All” you consent to the use of non-essential Cookies (i.e., functional, analytics, and marketing Cookies) and the related processing of personal data. You can manage your consent preferences by clicking Manage Preferences. You may withdraw a consent at any time by using the link “Cookie Preferences” in the footer of our website.

Our Privacy Notice is accessible here. To learn more about the use of Cookies on our website, please view our Cookie Notice.

First Brands’ great success — achieves final DIP approval after settling objections

Share

News and Analysis

First Brands’ great success — achieves final DIP approval after settling objections

Cat Corey's avatar
  1. Cat Corey
3 min read

Don’t miss out on news you won’t find anywhere else — get The Memo US and The Memo Europe in your inbox every two weeks.

“When dockets are quiet, people are working,” said Judge Christopher Lopez at the continuation of the second-day hearing in First Brands, and the veracity of that statement was shown as he granted final approval of the debtors’ DIP motion after having successfully reached settlements with all objecting parties.

The second-day hearing commenced on 6 November. During that hearing, the debtors announced that they had been able to resolve several of the objections made to the DIP motion, most notably from the UCC and Evolution. At the close of the hearing, however, a number of objections were still outstanding, including from Onset and the ABL agent.

Before the hearing resumed on 7 November, the debtors filed a revised proposed form of order that indicated that Onset’s objection had been resolved in a similar fashion as had been the Carnaby lenders’ and Aequum’s the day before. In addition, the ABL agent’s objections were also resolved, with that resolution to be included in the final order.

Sunny Singh of Weil Gotshal, counsel for the debtors, presented the debtors’ case-in-chief for the debtors, although most of his statements concerned small additional clarifications that parties were requesting to be contained in the final order.

Read all our public content for free

We won't spam. You can unsubscribe at any time.

What are you waiting for?

Try it out
  • We're trusted by the top 10 Investment Banks