🍪 Our Cookies

This website uses cookies, pixel tags, and similar technologies (“Cookies”) for the purpose of enabling site operations and for performance, personalisation, and marketing purposes. We use our own Cookies and some from third parties. Only essential Cookies are used by default. By clicking “Accept All” you consent to the use of non-essential Cookies (i.e., functional, analytics, and marketing Cookies) and the related processing of personal data. You can manage your consent preferences by clicking Manage Preferences. You may withdraw a consent at any time by using the link “Cookie Preferences” in the footer of our website.

Our Privacy Notice is accessible here. To learn more about the use of Cookies on our website, please view our Cookie Notice.

Share

Market Wrap

Friday Workout — Loose Lose; Putting out the Unitrash

Chris Haffenden's avatar
  1. Chris Haffenden
14 min read

The looseness of bond documentation and the flexibility it gives to sponsors and for certain creditors to win out at the expense of others in the debt stack — and often in the same class — is a well worn trope for capital markets journalists. 

To grab greater reader attention for up-tiering and drop down transactions they coined the sensationalist term ‘creditor-on-creditor violence’ to inflame market participants’ sense of unfairness, with aggrieved creditors keen to the play the victim of an allegedly heinous crime.

But we are not talking here about unsophisticated investors who have been duped by hidden documentary loopholes and crafty wording, most of this is occurring in plain sight. 

Read all our public content for free

We won't spam. You can unsubscribe at any time.

What are you waiting for?

Try it out
  • We're trusted by 9 of the top 10 Investment Banks