🍪 Our Cookies

This website uses cookies, pixel tags, and similar technologies (“Cookies”) for the purpose of enabling site operations and for performance, personalisation, and marketing purposes. We use our own Cookies and some from third parties. Only essential Cookies are used by default. By clicking “Accept All” you consent to the use of non-essential Cookies (i.e., functional, analytics, and marketing Cookies) and the related processing of personal data. You can manage your consent preferences by clicking Manage Preferences. You may withdraw a consent at any time by using the link “Cookie Preferences” in the footer of our website.

Our Privacy Notice is accessible here. To learn more about the use of Cookies on our website, please view our Cookie Notice.

From growth equity to creditor control, altnet providers feel the squeeze

Share

News and Analysis

From growth equity to creditor control, altnet providers feel the squeeze

Alessia Argentieri's avatar
Ryan Daniel's avatar
  1. Alessia Argentieri
  2. +Yusuf Sule
  3. + 1 more
9 min read

European alternative fibre network providers (altnets) — once darlings of the infrastructure investment boom — are entering a more unforgiving phase of their life cycle. After years of debt-fuelled expansion, rising interest costs, slower-than-expected customer take-up, and intensifying competition have pushed parts of the sector into outright distress.

The start of the year has already shown how the UK has emerged as one of the clearest pressure points, with recent headlines involving Gigaclear and G.Network underscoring the strain. What was sold as a land-grab for Britain’s digital future is now, in several cases, a restructuring story — with creditors, not founders or growth investors, increasingly in control. That reflects the sheer speed and scale of the country’s fibre build.

At the heart of the crisis is a mismatch between financial assumptions made in the era of cheap capital and the operating reality of a crowded fibre market.

Higher rates have transformed fibre from a long-dated infrastructure play into a leveraged balance-sheet problem. Interest costs now absorb cash that was meant to fund further build, while competitive overbuild has capped pricing power just as refinancing looms.

“Most of these models assumed financing was effectively free and that take-up would be linear,” said an investor. “Neither of those things turned out to be true.”

Read all our public content for free

We won't spam. You can unsubscribe at any time.

What are you waiting for?

Book a demo
  • We're trusted by the top 10 Investment Banks