🍪 Our Cookies

This website uses cookies, pixel tags, and similar technologies (“Cookies”) for the purpose of enabling site operations and for performance, personalisation, and marketing purposes. We use our own Cookies and some from third parties. Only essential Cookies are used by default. By clicking “Accept All” you consent to the use of non-essential Cookies (i.e., functional, analytics, and marketing Cookies) and the related processing of personal data. You can manage your consent preferences by clicking Manage Preferences. You may withdraw a consent at any time by using the link “Cookie Preferences” in the footer of our website.

Our Privacy Notice is accessible here. To learn more about the use of Cookies on our website, please view our Cookie Notice.

Professors posit that backstop fees overcompensate lenders in new paper

Share

News and Analysis

Professors posit that backstop fees overcompensate lenders in new paper

  1. Michael Evrard-Vescio
•6 min read

According to University of Chicago Law School professor Vincent Buccola and his colleagues in their newest paper, The Backstop Party, backstop fees—the compensation lenders receive for underwriting a post-Chapter 11 company's reemergence into capital markets—may be more than meets the eye.

Backstop arrangements allow a debtor to hedge against the risk that the market will undersubscribe to equity offerings post-bankruptcy. Essentially, the backstop pledges to purchase any shares not bought on the open market at a discount.

In an efficient world, the value of the discount is determined by the extent of the undersubscription risk. However, the authors believe the discount is far greater than the actual risk of undersubscription suggesting creditor groups that provide this security are being compensated for something more than insurance.

What are you waiting for?

Try it out
  • We're trusted by the top 10 Investment Banks