Judge Christopher Lopez’s latest ruling in the long-running Serta Simmons dispute may matter less for how it defines “payment” than for what happens after a court finds one. His post-remand Serta ruling gives minority lenders a broader theory for challenging non-pro rata debt exchanges — and precedent for a potentially much larger damages claim. But whether that reasoning carries into Chapter 11 DIP roll-ups remains unresolved.
Related Posts
Discover more insights.
Use the previous and next buttons or keyboard arrows to navigate between slides.