🍪 Our Cookies

This website uses cookies, pixel tags, and similar technologies (“Cookies”) for the purpose of enabling site operations and for performance, personalisation, and marketing purposes. We use our own Cookies and some from third parties. Only essential Cookies are used by default. By clicking “Accept All” you consent to the use of non-essential Cookies (i.e., functional, analytics, and marketing Cookies) and the related processing of personal data. You can manage your consent preferences by clicking Manage Preferences. You may withdraw a consent at any time by using the link “Cookie Preferences” in the footer of our website.

Our Privacy Notice is accessible here. To learn more about the use of Cookies on our website, please view our Cookie Notice.

Taking the Credit — Reputation, customisation and dodgy valuation

Share

Market Wrap

Taking the Credit — Reputation, customisation and dodgy valuation

Ryan Hesketh's avatar
Josie Shillito's avatar
  1. Ryan Hesketh
  2. +Josie Shillito
7 min read

This article is part of our new service, 9fin Private Credit. If you're interested in a free trial, contact subscriptions@9fin.com

How to value a credit when the portfolio is illiquid is a question that plagues private credit — and the result has been valuations that differ as much as 50% within different vehicles of the same asset manager, as reported by 9fin

In the hours since the FT reported that the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) will launch a review of private market valuations, private market intelligence companies have received a “flood” of inquiries from concerned investors, according to two data providers.

“In terms of private credit, we’ve had more inquiries in the last day than we’d had in total up to that moment,” the first of the providers said, “the dam has finally broken; it’s unleashed the floodgates.”

Read all our public content for free

We won't spam. You can unsubscribe at any time.

What are you waiting for?

Try it out
  • We're trusted by the top 10 Investment Banks