🍪 Our Cookies

This website uses cookies, pixel tags, and similar technologies (“Cookies”) for the purpose of enabling site operations and for performance, personalisation, and marketing purposes. We use our own Cookies and some from third parties. Only essential Cookies are used by default. By clicking “Accept All” you consent to the use of non-essential Cookies (i.e., functional, analytics, and marketing Cookies) and the related processing of personal data. You can manage your consent preferences by clicking Manage Preferences. You may withdraw a consent at any time by using the link “Cookie Preferences” in the footer of our website.

Our Privacy Notice is accessible here. To learn more about the use of Cookies on our website, please view our Cookie Notice.

The Default Notice — Pro non-pro rata

Share

Market Wrap

The Default Notice — Pro non-pro rata

Max Frumes's avatar
Rachel Butt's avatar
Max Reyes's avatar
Kartikeya Dar's avatar
  1. Max Frumes
  2. +Rachel Butt
  3. + 2 more
10 min read

Two situations this week again highlighted the tension between what is considered pro rata (open to everyone, equally) and not pro rata, fair or not fair — or somewhere in between. 

In the case of bankrupt regional sports broadcaster Diamond Sports9fin was the first to report this week that a group of dissenting lenders who hold second-lien and unsecured debt is looking to provide an alternative DIP. Currently, a group holding large chunks of first, second and unsecured funded debt is providing a DIP under the holistic agreement disclosed in January, which includes Amazon as a white knight strategic partner to revitalize the flailing regional sports network business.

Read all our public content for free

We won't spam. You can unsubscribe at any time.

What are you waiting for?

Try it out
  • We're trusted by 9 of the top 10 Investment Banks