The grammatical quirk that impacts cost savings in debt covenants

Share

News and Analysis

The grammatical quirk that impacts cost savings in debt covenants

James Wallick's avatar
  1. James Wallick
  2. +Antony Serban
5 min read

The nature and scope of what companies add back to EBITDA has broadened significantly over the past few years, to the point that modern-day debt covenants will often reveal three or more pages of expected cost savings and other items that can be added back to boost earnings.

Sometimes it feels like there’s no limit to what companies and their lawyers can come up with. But when it comes to the timeframes for achieving some of these cost savings, good old-fashioned English grammar might impose a hard stop.

Note the difference between these two sentences:

Read all our public content for free

We won't spam. You can unsubscribe at any time.

What are you waiting for?

Try it out
  • We're trusted by 9 of the top 10 Investment Banks

Cookies & Privacy

We would like to use cookies to improve our service. Is that ok?