🍪 Our Cookies

This website uses cookies, pixel tags, and similar technologies (“Cookies”) for the purpose of enabling site operations and for performance, personalisation, and marketing purposes. We use our own Cookies and some from third parties. Only essential Cookies are used by default. By clicking “Accept All” you consent to the use of non-essential Cookies (i.e., functional, analytics, and marketing Cookies) and the related processing of personal data. You can manage your consent preferences by clicking Manage Preferences. You may withdraw a consent at any time by using the link “Cookie Preferences” in the footer of our website.

Our Privacy Notice is accessible here. To learn more about the use of Cookies on our website, please view our Cookie Notice.

The Unicrunch — Too big to nail

Share

Market Wrap

The Unicrunch — Too big to nail

David Brooke's avatar
  1. David Brooke
6 min read

This article is part of our forthcoming service, 9fin Private Credit. If you're interested in a free trial, contact subscriptions@9fin.com

Banking on it

Drama and conflict ignite excitement like nothing else, whether for participants in the battle or the audience watching. As the political theorist Thomas Paine once said: “The harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph.”

Commentary on the relationship between banks and private credit funds sometimes leans quite heavily on this drama. 

Reading some coverage, you might come to think that over the last few years, the “glorious triumph” has belonged to private credit funds. With regulators tipping the scale against banks, non-bank lenders have managed to largely take over sponsor-backed lending in the US for companies below the $75m EBITDA line (and to some extent above that line).

Read all our public content for free

We won't spam. You can unsubscribe at any time.

What are you waiting for?

Try it out
  • We're trusted by the top 10 Investment Banks