🍪 Our Cookies

This website uses cookies, pixel tags, and similar technologies (“Cookies”) for the purpose of enabling site operations and for performance, personalisation, and marketing purposes. We use our own Cookies and some from third parties. Only essential Cookies are used by default. By clicking “Accept All” you consent to the use of non-essential Cookies (i.e., functional, analytics, and marketing Cookies) and the related processing of personal data. You can manage your consent preferences by clicking Manage Preferences. You may withdraw a consent at any time by using the link “Cookie Preferences” in the footer of our website.

Our Privacy Notice is accessible here. To learn more about the use of Cookies on our website, please view our Cookie Notice.

Voting cap language traced back to Blackstone deals

Share

News and Analysis

Voting cap language traced back to Blackstone deals

Jane Komsky's avatar
Tom Quinn's avatar
  1. Jane Komsky
  2. +Tom Quinn
•4 min read

Don’t miss out on news you won’t find anywhere else — get The Memo US and The Memo Europe in your inbox every two weeks.

Blackstone appears to be at least one sponsor who is including voting cap language on its deals.

9fin recently reported that “voting caps” — limits on the share of a bond or loan any given lender has the rights to vote on, regardless of how much the holder actually holds — have made it into the market.

One such company that included this voting cap language in its offering memorandum was Ellucian — a Blackstone and Vista Equity Partners sponsored company. Ellucian, a provider of software and consulting solutions to education institutions, included the following language in senior secured notes due 2029:

“In addition, for purposes of determining whether the required number of holders have (i) consented (or not consented) to any amendment, modification, waiver, consent or other action with respect to any of the terms of the indenture that will govern the notes, (ii) otherwise acted on any matter related to the indenture that will govern the notes or (iii) directed or required the Trustee, the Notes Collateral Agent, or any holder to undertake any action with respect to or under the indenture that will govern the notes, all notes held or beneficially owned by a holder or a beneficial owner (together with its affiliates) may not account for more than 20.0% of the notes included in determining whether the required number of holders have consented to any action (the “Voting Cap”). All notes held by any holder or beneficial owner or any affiliate of such holder or beneficial owner in excess of the Voting Cap shall be deemed to not be outstanding for all purposes of calculating whether the required number of holders have taken any action (or refrained from taking any action) or provided any consent or waiver with respect to the notes, subject to certain exceptions. These restrictions may impact a holder’s or beneficial owner’s ability to participate in a voting decision if such holder or beneficial owner and its affiliates own a large amount of notes.” (emphasis added)

What are you waiting for?

Try it out
  • We're trusted by the top 10 Investment Banks