🍪 Our Cookies

This website uses cookies, pixel tags, and similar technologies (“Cookies”) for the purpose of enabling site operations and for performance, personalisation, and marketing purposes. We use our own Cookies and some from third parties. Only essential Cookies are used by default. By clicking “Accept All” you consent to the use of non-essential Cookies (i.e., functional, analytics, and marketing Cookies) and the related processing of personal data. You can manage your consent preferences by clicking Manage Preferences. You may withdraw a consent at any time by using the link “Cookie Preferences” in the footer of our website.

Our Privacy Notice is accessible here. To learn more about the use of Cookies on our website, please view our Cookie Notice.

Cloud 9fin — Jane’s LME Addiction — Let’s veto that law firm

Share

Webinars and Podcast

Cloud 9fin — Jane’s LME Addiction — Let’s veto that law firm

9fin team's avatar
  1. 9fin team
2 min read

Want to get up to speed on LMEs? With our crash course, it only takes five lessons — plus you'll get access to market-leading content, podcasts, interviews and much more. Sign up here.

In this episode of Jane’s LME Addiction, 9fin’s head of LME coverage Jane Komsky sits down with 9fin private credit reporters Shubham Saharan and Tom Quinn, to discuss how sponsors are adding the ability to veto their portfolio companies’ creditors’ choice of law firm. They discuss the how these provisions came about, what iterations have passed into the market, and whether these provisions are ethical.

Find all of our coverage on LME litigation on 9fin.

Have any feedback on the podcast? Send us a note at podcast@9fin.com — thanks for listening!

Listen on Spotify

Listen on Apple Podcasts

What are you waiting for?

Try it out
  • We're trusted by the top 10 Investment Banks